Today's reading was about Leucippus and Democritus. A big
chunk of the reading covered Leucippus' theory of atomism, which was continued
by his pupil Democritus. I actually found it fascinating how their theory
sounds very similar to things we talked about in my high school science
courses. (You know, back when science was I thing I was required to take.) I
could go on to talk about what they said about atomism, but it would be at risk
of put putting on display my ignorance of anything science-y.
So instead I’ll skip to the very end. In aphorism number 54,
it says “cheerfulness arises in people through moderation of enjoyment and due
proportion in life. Deficiencies and excesses tend to change suddenly and give
rise to large movements in the soul. Souls that undergo motions involving large
intervals are neither steady nor cheerful…” Upon reading that, I immediately thought of
Aristotle when he says in the second book of Nicomachean Ethics “there are, then, three kinds of disposition:
two are vices (one marked by excess and one by deficiency), and one, virtue,
the mean.” Aristotle was looking at virtue as the true way to achieve eudaimonia (or happiness in the sense of
well-being and flourishing). So it seems that Aristotle borrowed directly from
Democritus (I’m assuming it was him) the idea that the extremes cause
imbalance, so true happiness is found in moderation.
Aristotle does seem to be philosophizing in a similar vein with respect to ethics though their metaphysics is quite different. Welcome back.
ReplyDeleteGood connection to Aristotle's view of virtue and vice.
ReplyDelete